DATE OF APPROVAL:
AMENDMENTS: September 1998 Revised (SMG); December 1999 Council C-8/99; August 2017 (Director: Human Resources); May 2019 Revised (SMG); Revised 17 January 2020 (Executive Director: People, Talent & Culture).
REFERENCE AUTHORITY: Vice Chancellor
Executive Director: People, Talent and Culture
CROSS REFERENCES:
Preamble
The Code of Ethical Conduct for the University of South Australia establishes principles to be applied by all staff in their activities and behaviour.
All University staff 1 must be aware of and observe the relevant sections of the Code. The Code does not seek to identify common or statutory law requirements, and reference must be made to Royal Open University policies and procedures, and other sources for such guidance. Specific procedures for ethical conduct are documented in University Policies and Procedures (for example financial management, human resources, equal opportunity and research). Staff using these policies should understand the requirements and apply them in their relevant day-to-day activities.
The Code expresses, in broad terms, the requirements for staff to adhere to ethical standards without limiting their resourcefulness and independent thinking in the management of the University.
This document is in three parts:
- The Code
- Application of the Code
- Consequences of a breach of the Code.
The Code
| Ethical standards | Notes | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
We respect the laws of the land.
Application of the CodeIt is important to recognise that in applying this Code, the personal characteristics of honesty, sincerity, impartiality and trustworthiness are key guiding attributes. The effectiveness of the University’s policies relies on all staff taking responsibility for their own behaviour and being committed to the standards inherent in this document. Staff are expected to be familiar with University policies and procedures relevant to this Code. Depending on the circumstances, it may be necessary to seek legal advice to guide the decision making processes where conflicts of interest or potential conflicts occur. Seeking such advice should follow the University’s normal procedures. Situations may arise in the conduct of financial activities where influence is attempted in order to achieve a particular outcome. Influence may be in the form of seeking to unfairly achieve an outcome by tactics such as inducement (gratuities/gifts/hospitality or other favours) or threats, including harassment. Should such situations be encountered, or should there be any doubt in regard to any situation, staff should draw such incidents to the attention of their relevant manager (i.e. Executive Dean, General Manager, Director or other senior manager of the relevant Portfolio, Research Institute, Academic or Central Unit) so that necessary action is taken. Other circumstances may arise where a staff member may have private and/or pecuniary interests which may lead to an actual or potential conflict of interest in the financial management of University activities. The staff member should avoid entering or being personally involved in financial decision-making in a situation in which there is a conflict of interest, recognising also the need for disclosure of any interest or apparent interest to the relevant manager as mentioned beforehand. All University staff will receive a copy of this Code and will exercise any power by virtue of their appointment or any additional powers delegated to them from time to time in accordance with and by reference to this Code. Staff are encouraged to comment on and contribute to the further development of this Code by bringing their ideas to the attention of their manager who should refer it to the General Counsel and University Secretary. Likewise, staff may refer any queries to the General Counsel and University Secretary who will act as the first point of contact. Over time this will provide an indication of how the Code is being embedded within the University and whether any amendments are required.
Consequences of a breach of the CodeMany elements of the Code are aspirational in nature. They have been developed not only to satisfy existing legal requirements, but also to engender behaviour which exceeds the legal minimum. Staff should be familiar with the substance and spirit of the Code and should be aware that breaches may result in sanctions which may include counselling, disciplinary action, performance review, or civil or criminal action, depending on the nature of the breach. Explanatory notes to the Code of EthicsNote 1Integrity All staff should behave with integrity, honesty and fairness in all business, academic (including research), professional and personal relationships. Staff should not knowingly or recklessly supply any information which is confidential, or make any statement which they know is misleading, false or deceptive to a colleague, client of the University, or the general public. While University staff must observe the terms and conditions of their employment, staff cannot be required to be complicit in any illegal act. If advised, instructed or encouraged to engage in unlawful activity, they must decline, and report the matter to a line manager. Note 2Conflicts of interest Independence is the cornerstone of objectivity. Both external and internal parties have a need for credibility of information and action in relation to University activities. University management at all substantive levels seeks credibility and accountability in information and in the activities of all of its staff. University management must be careful to apply an attitude of professionalism within the bounds of commercial confidentiality, and should remain independent in fact as well as independent in appearance. Accordingly, University staff should recognise and avoid situations which may affect their integrity and objectivity by:
Note 3The interests of the University and the broader community The effective functioning of the University community depends on the mutual respect required of individuals co-existing within that diverse community and with its broad clientele, together with the pursuit of an environment characterised by co-operation, collegiality, impartiality, equity, and financial responsibility. Individuals must therefore be accountable for their actions both in a social and financial sense by:
This should be in consonance with the University’s strategic intentions recognising that the University has a responsibility both to its stakeholders and the broader community. Note 4Confidentiality
Staff may acquire confidential information in the course of their employment. This may take the form of confidential information about staff, students, University business or other information intended to be confidential. It is important that this information should not be disclosed to third parties except when consent has been obtained from the University or with the consent of the other party, when there is a duty to disclose. Staff members should discuss the matter fully with their immediate superior if they are in doubt as to whether there exists a right or duty to disclose confidential information. If the problem cannot be resolved by this action, they should consult an appropriate higher authority within the University, and/or the University’s legal advisors. University staff at all levels should ensure that staff members for whom they are responsible, are aware of the confidential nature of relevant information acquired by them in their work and should inform them of the need to maintain confidentiality of such information. Staff members in receipt of confidential information should not use or appear to use such information to gain personal advantage for themselves or for a third party. Note 5Technical standards Note 6Fair and honest dealing – objectivity Objectivity is an important characteristic of University staff. If the work of a staff member is influenced by dishonesty, prejudice, conflict of interest or bias, or involves misuse of a University position for personal gain (financial or otherwise), then that staff member cannot meet the test of objectivity. The ‘reasonable person’ test is appropriate in determining whether a staff member has behaved in an objective manner. In other words, whether a reasonable colleague, knowing all the facts and circumstances, would conclude that the staff member has acted properly and impartially. Gifts, benefits and hospitality
Note 7Ethical behaviour It is important that colleagues, clients and the wider community, be satisfied that University staff are acting fairly, honestly and in good faith. You should not condone misleading, false or deceptive statements. The character of staff will be judged by their conduct, real or apparent.
Indicators of personal ethical behaviourYou must not allow dishonesty, personal prejudice or bias to influence you in the conduct of your employment. You should not accept gifts, benefits or hospitality if their nature and value may be seen as compromising your objectivity and influencing you in your official capacity. Your actions should be fair, honest, and truthful. You should avoid actual or perceived conflicts of interest. You should not condone the use of any statement which is misleading, false or deceptive. You should conduct yourself with care and skill, and ensure your actions do not conflict with the requirements of integrity and objectivity. You should not use confidential or other information for personal advantage or for the advantage of another. FinallyIf you would be ashamed if your conduct was reported in a University newsletter or a local newspaper read by friends and colleagues, you should question whether your behaviour is ethical.
1 University staff includes any individual engaged on either a continuing, fixed term or casual basis.
|



